(no subject)
Jan. 10th, 2007 05:46 pmThis is where I'm very thankful for the abundance of classic Doctor Who episodes, because after I psych myself up to watch End of Days (can't bring myself to do it just yet - Chibnall so close after Tregenna just ain't right) I'll have nothing new in this universe till either March/April, or whenever they start releasing Sarah Jane Adventures, whichever comes first. Hopefully, they'll be smart and give us SJA soon, so as to not have a great big gap.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:14 pm (UTC)What's amazing is when the early stuff does it. "Genesis of the Daleks," "City of Death" - even as early as "Inferno." There are draggy bits, but things get good enough I forget all about it after a while.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:19 pm (UTC)"Genesis" needed editing but the characterization is fantastic. "City of Death" is REALLY up there, too -- great plot, great villain -- though Douglas Adams' reworked version of it was still better. *winks broadly*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:24 pm (UTC)Oooh, knickers!
With "Genesis," I figured the writers were working on the opposite of today's mold. Instead of trimming episodes to fit the amount of time they had, they had to fill six episodes' worth of space. Putting most of the redundant stuff early on was probably a good move.
Reworked version, eh? Do tell!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:34 pm (UTC)OH yes. I would say "I had a crush on Sophie Aldred when I was growing up," but that would incorrectly imply that it is no longer the case. When I saw her doing the naked-but-covered bit on the cover of those audio books I think a good portion of my brain melted. 6_6
*nods* Some stories got out of hand, like "Seeds of Doom," but I can definitely see them pitching stories based on their complexity and only realizing later that they had to pad it to fill out the schedule.
*grins cryptically* Have you read the non-Hitch-Hiker's Adams books? One of them is a little bit similar to "City of Death" ... just like Life, the Universe, and Everything is rumored to have been a rejected Who script, Adams took the ideas that didn't get used in "City" and did something with them ...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:39 pm (UTC)Guh, Sophie Aldred! Not that I know much about her personally, but I adore Ace, and she played Ace, which is reason enough for me. <3
I've caughts bits of Shada in "Dirk Gently," but haven't come across "City of Death" stuff yet. Which book(s) would the references be in? (Bear in mind that I read Adams' stuff long before I knew DW, so I may have read something and had references go over my head.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:47 pm (UTC)Sophie likes to hang out with the fans after a convention. Since DW she's mostly done kids' television, though she still participates in the fandom; she's posed for the covers of a couple of the novels, read some audio books, and published her own photobook of series memories that's well worth it if you can find it.
Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency -- the villain's goal is the same as Scaroth's, to travel back in time to prevent the same thing from happening. The Professor is actually the Doctor, complete with the "broken telephone" that allows him to travel in time. Of course, the most brilliant part of Dirk Gently was the Coleridge and Bach material, which obviously didn't appear in "City of Death," and the best bits of "City of Death" (the yuppie art thieves, the villain in timelost shards) didn't appear in Dirk Gently. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:51 pm (UTC)Sophie sounds absolutely lovely! Now I really want to meet her.
Must re-read Dirk Gently's, now that I've seen the episodes. I know. Such a chore, re-reading good books. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:59 pm (UTC)Oh, me too ... yes ... *kinda gets distracted*
*smiles* It's fascinating to look at all the things Adams wrote and find the common links ... there's a coherent philosophy there, and one I should find the time to write a paper on.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-11 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:30 pm (UTC)And the ending. Oh my god.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:31 pm (UTC)